Kaum DAP Adalah Punca Rasuah Di Malaysia? Fakta atau Auta.

Keratan akhbar di atas adalah contoh bagaimana rasuah boleh menular dalam negara ini.

Jika tiada yang sudi memberi, macam mana ada penerima? Mana datangnya perkataan KAWTIM kalau bukan dari kaum DAP.

Namun dalam perang persepsi rasuah, perkara yang ditimbulkan oleh DAP dan pembangkang adalah rasuah HANYA MELIBATKAN PENJAWAT AWAM YANG KEBANYAKANNYA ADALAH ORANG MELAYU.

Mungkin mereka terlupa siapakah pemberi rasuah kepada penjawat awam ini.

DAP berjaya dalam medan perang persepsi rasuah. Kerana dengan menyerang penjawat awam, mereka berjaya menutup kegiatan rasuah sektor swasta yang menjadi amalan mereka. Setiap eksekutif atau pengurus jualan akan mendapat elaun keraian (entertainment allowance) yang tinggi untuk menjamu para pelanggan mereka. Kadangkala elaun keraian ini lebih tinggi dari gaji mereka kerana jika tidak dihulur kepada sasaran berkepentingan, macam mana nak buat jualan (sales).

Kenapa MyMassa guna perkataan PERANG PERSEPSI dalam artikel ini? Sebabnya dalam menakrifkan rasuah, tiada nilai sebenar yang boleh jadi ukuran. Hanya persepsi yang dinilai. Kerana itulah Transparency International juga mengukur rasuah dengan ukuran yang sama iaitu persepsi.


Oleh kerana itu, MyMassa cuba untuk meneutralkan kembali persepsi ini bahawa siapa sebenarnya pesalah sebenar dalam hal ini. DAP cuba mewujudkan persepsi bahawa mereka adalah pihak yang BERSIH tetapi cuba lihat surat pembaca ini di Free Malaysia Today (FMT);

Bayan Mutiara deal: State government must explain

February 8, 2012

FMT LETTER: From Calvin Sankaran, via e-mail

The Penang state government under Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng prides itself for its CAT (Competence Accountable and Transparent) principle that forms the cornerstone of its administration.

Unfortunately in practice the application of this principles has been rather selective and only when it is convenient. In many instances the administration’s decisions and policies have been made in a very opaque and exclusive manner with little or no public consultation or information dissemination. Latest of such example is the controversial Bayan Mutiara deal that is currently being hotly debated in Penang.

Recently it was announced that the state-owned PDC (Penang Development Corporation), has sold 103 acres of super-prime land at Bayan Mutiara to a private developer for RM1.1 billion. This parcel of land is one of the most coveted areas in Penang due to its sea-facing frontage and strategic location due to its close proximity to the Penang Bridge, the Free Trade Zone and the Penang International Airport.

For an administration that claims to be people-friendly, surprisingly there was no public consultation at all on the decision to sell this land, considered to be PDC’s crown jewel. This deal also seemed to point to a serious conflict of interest and flaw in the decision making process as the two parties that involved in selling the land, the Chief Minister Inc (CMI) and PDC, are both headed by the Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng himself.

The first and foremost question is why there is a need to sell the land when it can be developed by PDC itself for maximum public benefits. PDC certainly has the requisite expertise and experience to do so as it has carried out such many projects in the past.

The unconvincing counter argument is that the state needs money to fund its affordable housing scheme from this deal. If it is indeed that case, then PDC could have gone ahead and developed the land by itself and used the proceeds to fund housing for the low income group.

The state made RM1.1 billion from the sale but the developer is targeting a Gross Development Value of RM10 billion from their “Penang World City” project. This means that the state could have made 10 times more money had it been more careful, prudent, competent and responsible.
The second troubling issue is the price of RM240 per square feet (psf) that PDC sold the land for. This valuation is shockingly low when compared to market value and recent land purchase transactions. For example, a land in the nearby Queensbay was sold for RM420 psf and another at Batu Ferringhi was recently purchased at RM474 psf. This seems to indicate that the much-touted “open tender” policy of the state government is either a complete failure and/or a mere public relation exercise.

The third issue is on why pubic land is being used for the benefits of private developers instead of tax payers and rakyat. If the land is being used for affordable housing, public amenities or other such noble purposes, then this decision can be supported and even applauded. Instead the land is being developed for mixed development: residential (high-rise and low-rise), commercial (mall, shop-houses, hotel, health care centres, office towers and leisure club) all of which are meant to cater for business and ultra-rich foreigners.

Not only this project brings no benefit whatsoever for rakyat, it also will result in long term, serious and negative repercussions in hiking up the already sky-high houses prices in the state, degrade the environment, increase the population density and worsen the traffic flow that is already choking up the island.

Fourthly, the Chief Minister was quoted as saying that the reclaimed land was offered on a freehold basic. This ill-advised move is highly detrimental and against the public interest. Such over generous terms in selling public assets can only be described as irresponsible.

Finally, I am puzzled about the RM500 million mock cheque that CM Guan Eng presented to PDC during the purchasing agreement signing ceremony with the developer. Based on the terms of contract, PDC is only scheduled to receive RM500 million two years after the signing of the purchase agreement. As such, can the state government explain where did cheque for RM500 million come from?

Since this deal has long term and very serious repercussions, the state government is duty bound to provide clear and unambiguous answers to all these above questions, in line with its CAT motto.

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2012/02/08/bayan-mutiara-deal-state-government-must-explain/

Orang nombor satu dalam Kerajaan Negeri DAP pun rasuah? Hanya yang telah terpengaruh dengan propaganda DAP bahawa mereka ini bersih sahaja akan menolak perkara ini. Jika benar LIM GUAN ENG di pihak yang benar dalam isu ini, KENAPA DIA TIDAK MENYAMAN PIHAK YANG MENUDUHNYA SEBAGAIMANA KES-KES YANG LAIN?


*Kaum DAP adalah punca rasuah di Malaysia? Anda tahu jawapannya.